|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
539
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 16:17:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ginseng Jita wrote:Might as well hand them golden tickets because the new barges are exactly the kind of ships AFK miners and botters will appreciate. My question is...
Why are you promoting AFK mining and botting CCP?
I don't know where's the problem. People afk mining at low yeld while doing some work are not any longer easy prey, that's not a problem for you if you just put the effort to gank them and if it's not worthy just move on and gank something else.
Bots? -it's CCP job to clean them up and decide who is or who isn't, not some frustrated kids because they can't gank mining barges with a single 3M destroyer....do what you should witch means report and play the game, with new aggression stuff you guys can play space GI's and gank as much as you want but maybe, I really mean maybe, those are a little bit harder to kill with 3M destroyers.
Seriously, what are you complaining about? brb |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
539
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 16:39:00 -
[2] - Quote
Fuujin wrote:On the one hand, I'm against these changes since hisec mining with these ridiculous tanks now redefines "risk-free activity," which to me is antithetical to the design of eve (a risk-filled universe).
Now the balm to this is that with the return of the mining bot (they never really left) to full strength the cost of low ends will plummet. Enjoy your 10-15M per hour grinding existence.
Once again I don't see where's the problem.
Do you guys make crapthreads about multiboxing making bot activity the best way to go and make isk? -no
Are those mining barges ungankable? -no Just fit better ships and go gank them, if it's boring or unprofitable just move along and do something else, why not afk mining? brb |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
539
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 17:02:00 -
[3] - Quote
Werst Dendenahzees wrote:A pr0 tanked hulk RIGHT NOW can reach 30-40k EHP even without dumb faction mods. After the buff, it's easily double that. The other ships are going to be even better. I am fitting a battle skiff as we speak.
So there's no problem but a well deserved balance. If you feel someone is botting you can use report button or just decide to gank them witch will FINALLY require some effort and not the pathetic mindless mongoloid activity that is atm. brb |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
539
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 17:26:00 -
[4] - Quote
Fuujin wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Werst Dendenahzees wrote:A pr0 tanked hulk RIGHT NOW can reach 30-40k EHP even without dumb faction mods. After the buff, it's easily double that. The other ships are going to be even better. I am fitting a battle skiff as we speak. So there's no problem but a well deserved balance. If you feel someone is botting you can use report button or just decide to gank them witch will FINALLY require some effort and not the pathetic mindless mongoloid activity that is atm. You fail to see motivations. Destroying mindless bots is fun and profitable now. Post-gank, it will be too much of a hassle. Reporting them would be :effort: and actually counter to our best interests--indeed, letting them run is quite good for us! Bots reduce the price of minerals and ships. They hurt miners, but not PVPers; so it's actually all up to you to report them. We'll just shake our heads and move on to find some nice fool hauling his life around in a badger.
Thing is that "bot" argument is a very bad argument, I'd like CCP to actually post how many bots are gone after a couple ganks in witch case I'll applause your gaming, and how many players just left because they're tired of this mindless mongoloid activity harassing their gaming time to the point nothing they do is profitable or enjoyable, like it or not some people might just like to mine and there's nothing wrong with this, what's wrong is people assuming every one mining is a bot and should just be "holly punished for this internet space injury"...
I guess you can live with the fact you need to put some effort to gank mining barges, on the other hand CCP has nothing to win loosing customers because of some mindless gameplay and bad design (mining) Again, it's not players job to play space Gi's or whatever ridiculous laddie tights avenger, report and let them do their job, because it's their job not yours. I don't like bots, I hate what that crap stuff does to the game in general but I just can't think about it seriously without having an IRL laugh if I start putting aside several points this game promotes openly: multiboxing, alts, massive destruction (requiring massive base materials)
It's just the easy way out to assume new mining barges = bots just to cry some oceans because :effort: now is needed.
PS: I don't mine any more, there are more/less interesting activities that make me a lot more isk/h for the time I can afford to play. brb |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
539
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 17:47:00 -
[5] - Quote
Werst Dendenahzees wrote: I am laughing and posting because carebears don't seem to realize how their wishes for safer mining and larger ore holds can backfire hilariously, as if enacted by a genie with a twisted sense of humor.
Sure, you can mine safely and AFK... for 5 mil isk/h.
Low risk = low reward -this is exactly the pre buff argument about high sec yadayada "ho might too much income", those crap ships get some ehp and bigger cargo bay but bad yeld witch leads to low income, seems you got what you asked for.
Where's the problem?
brb |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
539
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 18:01:00 -
[6] - Quote
Fuujin wrote:Suqq Madiq wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:i mean this change literally benefits me because i have isk invested in high-ends which will actually be used in manufacturing when lowends drop back down, but i dislike the idea of risk-free hisec mining If this change really benefited you as much as you claim, you wouldn't be depositing vast quantities of your tears all over every thread involving Barge and Exhumer buffs. And nobody actually believes mining is risk-free. Every ship in the game is gankable if you use the right tools and have enough friends to pull it off. The upcoming changes do nothing to alter that, except maybe forcing people to make more friends. Which is just madness in an MMO.  The difference being that freighters and orcas haul billions, and the only other hisec ships to warrant the effort are blinged out incursion/mission runners, also worth billions. As for the proof of the bot population: That's easily answered. Ice Interdiction: in the beginning, there were 30+ macks in an ice belt, mindlessly working away. After a few days of concentrated ganks, the bot population went away--they migrated to other regions where their ISK generation wouldn't be encumbered. The remaining population was the humans too dumb to realize this basic economic reality. It went from exhumers so thick you couldn't swing a cat around without hitting one, to ghost belts. Our opposition to this is twofold: One, ganking is fun. Won't deny it. This nerf all but removes it. Sad, but oh well. Two, and more importantly: this creates a virtual risk-free activity in eve. Low/Nul barges can still be killed, but hisec gets concord, so EHP past a certain level means guaranteed surivival. Low risk/reward? Try no risk for reward. And yes, our efforts DID result in hisec mining being worthwhile for the first time in...a looong time. Smart miners who fit something called "tanks" to their exhumers and were semi-active at the game could easily shrug off attacks and avoid them. And make isk hand over fist. Good luck with that once this nerf hits; trit's gonna fall like a rock within a few weeks.
Actually it's CCP's effort to take away Drone alloys that made mining interesting again. You've just disrupted mining activity for a while, then add all the bots CCP actually banned (not your mindless ganking false argument).
So let's resume this to simple words: Drones alloys gone + bots ban (thx CCP and GJ Shreegs) leads to less minerals in the market, making mining actually worthy. Your contribution to this is undeniable, but absolutely not in those proportions "gankers" in general pretend just like if they weren't there "oul+ál+á" the game would die: flash news says it wouldn't.
Now how many players got tired and left the game because of this? -can you really answer this question without the "adapt or die" you seem no willing to accept yourself?
Anyway, there's no end ores in high sec therefore not that much profitable as it seems, just make them space love you and go mine uber end ores in null. Now that would be great for the game and the community.
brb |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
544
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 18:19:00 -
[7] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Actually it's CCP's effort to take away Drone alloys that made mining interesting again. You've just disrupted mining activity for a while, then add all the bots CCP actually banned (not your mindless ganking false argument).
So let's resume this to simple words: Drones alloys gone + bots ban (thx CCP and GJ Shreegs) leads to less minerals in the market, making mining actually worthy. Your contribution to this is undeniable, but absolutely not in those proportions "gankers" in general pretend just like if they weren't there "oul+ál+á" the game would die: flash news says it wouldn't.
Now how many players got tired and left the game because of this? -can you really answer this question without the "adapt or die" you seem no willing to accept yourself?
Anyway, there's no end ores in high sec therefore not that much profitable as it seems, just make them space love you and go mine uber end ores in null. Now that would be great for the game and the community.
continue to believe that hulkageddon was totally irrelevant and had no effect on hisec mining despite the 15k kills, most of which were in may continue to believe that hisec mining will remain as profitable as it is now even with substantially reduced ganking and lower-tier barges/exhumers having substantially higher yield and tank than they do now drone alloys were a significant source of high-ends, not low-ends
The only thing I believe is that you actually over estimate your contribution and just don't like to come with :numbers: to prove your point. The highest minerals provider was drone regions, then high sec botting/mining then reprocess. Drones are gone, thousands of bots are gone, loot and modules to reprocess dropped drastically and you still argue it's your holly contribution that made mining worthwhile? -no, your contribution is smaller than you will ever admit, but for sure your contribution for this mining barges changes is quite huge.
Those ships are not invincible, just require some effort so again, where's the problem? brb |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
544
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 18:39:00 -
[8] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:... and it was so stupid that CCP implemented mining ships? and then decided that they should never be ganked ever because, as they have shown through their actions (repeated concord buffs, removal of insurance from concord kills, mining barge HP buff) hisec miners are a protected class
Not really protected since you can gank them. However if you really think it's a good game balance to be able to kill 300M ships (some times more) with a simple 3M T1 fitted destroyer, then this is an endless discussion with fake arguments.
You wanted high sec income nerf: -incursions nerf: check -wrecks loot severely nerf: check -missions level/rewards nerf: check -mining ships mine too much, therefore need to mine less: check
So you can't just pick a 3M ship and kill mining barges any more in a few days again, just take more ships and kill it.
Another idea, start massively ganking T1 haulers, mission ships and alike and when CCP buffs those because players get tired and leave the game, instead of crying about CCP buffing them just ask yourself if your actions didn't helped or forced CCP to do it faster to avoid accounts bleeding. What is so hard for you to understand your actions WILL ALWAYS bring consequences. Just deal with it.
I play in Null, I don't mine but I just can't understand this mindless stupidity consisting on doing whatever just to ruin some players game continuously with such false arguments to cover the pleasure of bulling the weaker. brb |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
545
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 18:53:00 -
[9] - Quote
Ginseng Jita wrote:I would just like to hear what CCP intends to do with the increased botting and AFK mining these new barges will no doubt create. Also, don't tell me it won't happen because the new EHP for some of barges is increasing to the amounts of cruiser and one will be as good as any BS. Park them in high-sec ice field and walk away for an hour or have your isboxer and G15 keyboard or third party app set for botting - no fear of gank because sitting in a .7 ice field pretty much garuantees 100% safety.
There will be less than you people pretend this buff will bring, remember that Shreegs didn't got those bots banned with farts or thanks to all gaking but because he did he's job. Are you clearly stating because of mining barges buff he's now unable to do it???
C'mon, 10YO little kids might believe all this fake propaganda and support ganker tears because it's nothing else but that.
AGAIN, no those miners are not safe, pick a couple of friends and go gank them like you did before to keep the belt all for you. Ho wait you're crying because now it will require you to put some effort??
C'mon... brb |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
547
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 18:55:00 -
[10] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:So you can't just pick a 3M ship and kill mining barges any more in a few days again, just take more ships and kill it. a 500k isk rifter can paralyze a 3b isk vindicator
Yep and also 75M Drakes can kill full fleets of Lokis I'm quite aware of that too.
Let me just reiterate my suggestion: start massively and continuously ganking missioners and haulers, so they might get the well deserved buffs faster thanks to you  brb |
|

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
547
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 19:00:00 -
[11] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Xercodo wrote:I always loved the look and feel of that little skiff, I'm excited to see the future of null sec mining....everyone in tanked up procurors and skiffs doing ninja ops to help build the next titan :P nobody tanks mining ships in nullsec because the prevailing mindset there is "if you get in a situation where a tank matters you're dead anyway" ah but that's not so true in a skiff with it's +2 warp stab bonus (which i think is still there on sisi... infact i should go and check that) edit: oh no, the bonus has gone :( sad times.
I can still get you with my Prot and his Shadow Serpentis Scram (3pts)  brb |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
547
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 19:30:00 -
[12] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Dave stark wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Xercodo wrote:I always loved the look and feel of that little skiff, I'm excited to see the future of null sec mining....everyone in tanked up procurors and skiffs doing ninja ops to help build the next titan :P nobody tanks mining ships in nullsec because the prevailing mindset there is "if you get in a situation where a tank matters you're dead anyway" ah but that's not so true in a skiff with it's +2 warp stab bonus (which i think is still there on sisi... infact i should go and check that) edit: oh no, the bonus has gone :( sad times. I can still get you with my Prot and his Shadow Serpentis Scram (3pts)  "it should cost 1bn to kill a hisec miner" - lin-young borovskova, 2012
The Mr was talking about a 2 pts skiff in null/low .... 
Read again and try again but hey, requires some :effort:  brb |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
547
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 19:41:00 -
[13] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:EpicFailTroll wrote:Abloobloo abloobloo why can't we farm Schadenfreude easily anymore "cold, harsh universe" ahahahahahaha not really, welcome to MLP Online
Have you considered my idea about start massively ganking haulers and missioners? -this is good for KB's and can result in some interesting buffs too that will obviously profit to null sec too.
Do it, NAO !!  brb |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
547
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 20:34:00 -
[14] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:It's not your business to decide what CCP does.
You are entrenched in your 0.0 blueball anyway, no? the gradual removal of all nonconsensual pvp from hisec is a great idea, yes i'm sure they'll enjoy the 3-month subscriber spike followed by everyone leaving for another MMO after they shed all of their core players
The so called "core players" are more about rage quitting for peanuts and the worst costumer you can ever have, they think they deserve more than any other when in fact their a true pain in the arse for everything, those are more like dog crap on your shoes when you want to make things evolve.
Business is business, costumers come and costumers go, and the more crying bitches go the better costumers you get  brb |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
547
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 20:38:00 -
[15] - Quote
Werst Dendenahzees wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Business is business, costumers come and costumers go, and the more crying bitches go the better costumers you get  This is exactly why ganking and wardeccing should be made easier.
It's YOUR point of view, seems it's not EVERYONE's point of view so in the end who decides what's better for the company?
------> CCP brb |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
547
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 20:46:00 -
[16] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:The so called "core players" are more about rage quitting for peanuts and the worst costumer you can ever have, they think they deserve more than any other when in fact their a true pain in the arse for everything, those are more like dog crap on your shoes when you want to make things evolve. Business is business, costumers come and costumers go, and the more crying bitches go the better costumers you get  those are not core players the core players are the ones who enjoy the pvp-centric aspect of this game, UGC and an economy that is almost entirely player-driven, the ones who hope that it stays this way those are the players who have kept this game going since 2003, not the carebears who burn out after training for a hulk/tengu/CNR and realizing that saving the damsel in distress for the 20th time isn't that exciting
I'm quite sure eve will not die if those decide to gtfo tomorrow and I'm ready to bet on it. If those have nothing better to do of their life than search for whatever attention about their insignificant little person from a business company, I'd strongly advice them to try to join ONU volunteer programs and go give their sub money to help feed little kids dyeing everyday of malnutrition.
Now those yeah, fecking yeah, those are real fecking awesome people deserving a big /hat off for what they do. Moaning and crying bitches because of pixels? -seriously? peh...
 brb |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
547
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 20:54:00 -
[17] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Dave stark wrote: except a destroyer isn't really comparable to a tank in this analogy. because the tank is radically more expensive and bigger than a digger. see the point? if a destroyer cost 300m and such i really wouldn't bother arguing the point.
An RPG-7 can destroy a Digger in under a second. It costs a lot less than the digger, and it's used up in the process. Just like a catalyst.
You made me lol, you know why 
brb |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
547
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 21:00:00 -
[18] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Jorma Morkkis wrote:Fuujin wrote:On the one hand, I'm against these changes since hisec mining with these ridiculous tanks now redefines "risk-free activity," which to me is antithetical to the design of eve (a risk-filled universe).
Now the balm to this is that with the return of the mining bot (they never really left) to full strength the cost of low ends will plummet. Enjoy your 10-15M per hour grinding existence. Risk vs. reward. Low risk = low reward. Mining in .9 with a Skiff will have 0 risk. How much reward should you get?
It's not 0 risk, pick enough ships and snipe it with a single shot. Or just start killing haulers, empty haulers, doesn't matter they can't shoot back anyway and you can also do that in a catalyst, gak is just for lols right? -start ganking haulers :p
 brb |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
548
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 21:08:00 -
[19] - Quote
Werst Dendenahzees wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Jorma Morkkis wrote:Fuujin wrote:On the one hand, I'm against these changes since hisec mining with these ridiculous tanks now redefines "risk-free activity," which to me is antithetical to the design of eve (a risk-filled universe).
Now the balm to this is that with the return of the mining bot (they never really left) to full strength the cost of low ends will plummet. Enjoy your 10-15M per hour grinding existence. Risk vs. reward. Low risk = low reward. Mining in .9 with a Skiff will have 0 risk. How much reward should you get? So it's been rendered invincible? Well you will need 10+ tornados to destroy one. Unlike a freighter (the other ship that requires this kind of coordination to kill), it can't contain 10 billion isk of loot. Hence, no one is going to pay a billion isk in tornados to kill a 100m isk ship.
Then this is a buff for gankers, now they will have to stop doing their business alone and start finding friends to gank multi billions loot pi+Ĥatas.
I say this is a huge buff to ganking actually. brb |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
548
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 21:14:00 -
[20] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Danny Diamonds wrote:Why is there this notion that suicide ganking should be profitable at all?
Go fight something that can shoot back. Suicide Ganking is exactly as profitable as the victims make it.
They will have bigger cargo holds so my gess is that you will drop more minerals than before so it's profitable 
brb |
|

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
548
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 21:31:00 -
[21] - Quote
Momoyo wrote:Pretty sure ratting bots make more money than mining bots
And some do it with Nyx's, so yep, seems those should be the next crusade against bots since mining ones became "invincible" when people are not willing to put the effort to get them.
I just don't get it, why would you spend time and isk to kill mining barges for some "crusade" (lol irl about this) and then suddenly you just can't do it because you need to loose some ships? Are those "players" doing the right thing or you just bullying the weaker?
If it's a matter of isk I'm quite sure NPC Guristas/Blood Rider missions/lp's/bounty's are far more profitable, and there are always some dudes to shoot at for peeveepee and make someone's life miserable  brb |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
548
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 22:33:00 -
[22] - Quote
Anvil44 wrote:Wow this whole thread gave me lots of chuckles. Gankers shedding tears over things not being so easy for them. Instead of adapting, they are crying. Where have I heard about that before?
Buff to Hulk isn't too much greater, a slight buff to armor and shields mostly, hull is actually weaker. Skiff and Mack's have those buffs but larger sig radius to go with it, making them more vulnerable to bigger guns. If you have to gank them, don't just fit for maximum damage(sounds alot like telling miners not to fit for maximum yield, doesn't it?), but fit for making your weapons more effective - target painters, webbers, scramblers.
Basically all CCP has done is given miners a 'security blanket' with camo paint on it to look like a nicely armored ship. Most miners will continue to mine as they have before, leaving them vulnerable to ganking. It will just take gankers with some smarts to pull it off.
I also had to laugh at the mention of the 'great coordination' to gank during the burn Jita event. A bunch of ships sat there outside the dock and ganged up on a ship. Big whoop on that. I've seen 12 yr olds pull of the same coordination when having water balloon fights too.
Lastly, the real reason gankers are so upset by the changes? You are going to see a lot less Hulks now as other barges and exhumers become viable alternatives. Coveterageddon or Procurerageddon or Retrieverageddon just does NOT have the same ring to it as Hulkageddon. So there you go. The real reason behind the tears explained.
I've seen lots of comments in the forums about it being a cold hard universe. Now it is harder for gankers. They've had it too easy for too long. I even saw many comments made on the Hulkageddon site by gankers saying their real goal was to make CCP change insurance payouts. "Don't blame us, blame CCP. Petition them to change it. It'll be better for everyone" So now we have these changes, lets adapt people.
Nah, they rather complain cry and moan "we're the faithful customers and the final word is ours or we just go away CCP!!"
Quite hilarious the fact most of them are completely unable to even think they might have shot their own foot. brb |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
548
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 22:42:00 -
[23] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:We will adapt, that is why we are the stronger species. Lets not forget that suicide ganking has been nerfed in to the ground repeatedly. We're still here.
It has not, it's just getting some balance. The day you get insta lock/killed/pod by concord if you ever put a foot in high sec with -5.01 and you just can't work your SS back by any other way than change officer rat tags, then yes it will be nerf to the ground.
But you can still make a few jumps in null to get afk rating bots/players etc but you will not get Concord and high sec protection. brb |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
549
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 17:51:00 -
[24] - Quote
Ginseng Jita wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Ginseng Jita wrote:Might as well hand them golden tickets because the new barges are exactly the kind of ships AFK miners and botters will appreciate. My question is...
Why are you promoting AFK mining and botting CCP?
You have a terrible attitude towards the game of EVE. Why on Earth are you still playiing ? GO AWAY. Laterz............... No....I love EVE. What I do not like is poorly thought out game mechanics.
Then you should definitively stop playing Eve.
And to all those guys with their crocodile tears let me remind you the first Eve commandment: Adapt or die
brb |
|
|
|